User talk:Sangodoc

From PWI Wiki
Revision as of 22:36, 9 November 2010 by PWpedia>Sangodoc (→PWI Wiki - Guilds: Responded to comment)
Jump to navigationJump to search

When adding new comments please use the "+" link above to add a new section for your comments and please give a useful title to the section.
When adding to existing sections please put your new comments below the old ones. Use colons to indent if necessary.

Thank you.


Eatwithspoons Discussions

oh for those talk pages you can straight edit the page and delete the comment, as long as it's spam no worries --Eatwithspoons 22:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I took care of it thanks. Also, I think you suggested addons? We're working on getting a few added in for us real soon --Eatwithspoons 19:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Alright I took care of it, thanks a bunch! Hopefully one of our addons that we plan to implement will help with this kind of thing. --Eatwithspoons 00:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I've put in a request for this so right now I'm waiting to see when it will be implemented. --Eatwithspoons 22:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


Information for the wiki you'd like added

If there's anything you'd like my help adding to the wiki, either add a short description of it to this section, or, if it might require some discussion, use the "+" link at the top to create a new section for it. Please link to any information needed to create the section you want added, as that will make it much easier for me to add. Finally, please sign your comment by putting a "~~~~" at the end of your comment. Thanks! -- Sangodoc (talk) 01:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


Upon your request

I have returned the Human 1-19 quests to its normal state. --Ctrlotus 03:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem! I thought i would improve the wiki, actually. It would make transfering from other, non-pwe game wikis easier, because i haven't seen a single wiki besides PWE's use this format. EDIT: What improvements would you suggest for me to make the quest section less of a WoT? --Ctrlotus 03:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
For some things, such as the quests, you could try "click to show" boxes. That would shorten the text walls, and allow for aditional info on things, like what type spell to use, or warn of exceptionally hard mobs to kill for that level. A good example of this would be the Elemental Tapestry, lever 36 if I remember correctly--Ctrlotus 05:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


Article links

You said to use links to other articles in the format "Article Name" or "text you want to appear", and not "Name" But isn't http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Talk_page and http://www.pwdatabase.com/mob/1379 outside links? I'm not sure where I used that since you apparently removed it before I could make any corrections. Is there any reason why I can not link to those pages. The reason I wrote this is I could not seem to find any information about or links to the User and User Talk pages. These methods where not known to me and I can see why some people would be lost trying to figure how the simplest in the WIKI system works. I found many elaborate and extensive formatting methods but it has been years since I have done any programming at all. Your really quick on the draw with new input. --Ctstew 04:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC) ,user talk:ctstew

I understand about the difference between an external link and an internal link. In the case of the cloud skatefish I wanted to identify that it was a link, as it is now you can not tell easily that the word is a link and so not many will follow to view the detailed information. Do you have a standard way that the link can be identified when using double brackets for an internal link?
And is there a template page for the pet detail page?
Also I think that the "Pet Skills" page and "Ultimate Pet List" page should be merged. How do I request this and what is the process for doing it? I'm sure that I should not just do the merge myself or can I?
--Ctstew 18:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Style

The current color scheme of the wiki looks like piss over shit and is hard to read. Are you able to update the style to match the forum and make it so the links are differentiated from the text? Asterelle 18:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

PWI Wiki - Guilds

Well then why don't you actually do your job?

65% of you heaven's tears guilds listed, ARE NOT IN EXISTANCE any more.

25% are out dated - different leaders or website gone.

the remaining 10% are factions that are not on Heavens Tear.

Besides, what is the purpose of having a number for a link?

Why not just show the whole link?

Do you think you are impressing us? You aren't. -- Kyrrel 21:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

First of all, it is not my job to keep track of every faction that is listed on those pages on every server. I don't know where you got the impression that that was my job, but that is false.
Second of all, if you have evidence that those factions are not in existence, changed leaders, or are listed incorrectly, anyone can update them. As a side note, I would rather have a nonexistent faction be listed, than accidentally remove an existing faction that has merely downsized or changed servers.
Third, your first four points have nothing to do with what I wrote to you earlier. You didn't do anything about those problems either, when it is fully within your power to do so. Furthermore, I did not create those lists, nor do I maintain them in any other way that making sure that they follow a common format and that they are not vandalized.
Fourth, I didn't say that you couldn't show the whole link, I just said that I wanted the Guild Directory pages done in a standard way. Your edit where you unnecessarily added "Server:" to every listing was prior to your removing the brackets around the links, so that's why it and all following revisions got undone. If you think we should change it that way, then, as I stated earlier, I'm open to hearing your reasons why, I just don't see the difference. You say, "Why not?", but I asked "Why?" first. If your reason sounds good, then all Guild Directories should be changed the same way, and not just one of them.
Finally, there is no need to be insulting. It doesn't make what you say any more valid. If you have constructive criticism I'm more than happy to listen to that, but I won't waste my time listening to empty insults. -- Sangodoc - PWI wiki mod (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
(above response copied on Kyrrel's talk page)