PWpedia:Community Portal/Archive 1
This is an archive of old comments from the PWpedia:Community Portal page.
Do not edit or reply to any comments here. Newer material should be archived at the bottom of the page, in chronological order by first comment in each section.
Banners
Hello Can Any 1 please Make Me Some Banners for male fashion, female fashion, and baby pets it would greatly appreciated thnx--Rubbaduckazilla 12:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have seen some threads on the forums -- i think in the screenshots forum -- about people making banners. Fulgida 11:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Cost?
dont know how sorry im new at this game like i havent even dowloaded it cause i wanna knoww if its a 100 % free to play Kyleramsay 10:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- You should download and play it before you make any decisions. Yes, it is technically 100% free to play, you don't pay anything unless you absolutely want to... But for added benefits (larger inventory & bank, binding charms, etc.) you'll have to pay unless you find someone selling them in a user shop. Llewellyn 23:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes i suggest you play the game... and yes it is 100% free. Its super fun and is a very popular game. If you want to spend money in the item mall than you can bye whats called Zen then you can bye special items in game... most fashions you can bye in the auction but they cost extra coins so be shure you have every thing you want to bye before spending extra money. The item mall also has every thing in it but it is still 100% free --Janelle4646 16:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)ellie
Just wondering
If you have any ideas on making this wiki more clean please send me a PM on the forum. I want to make this wiki really polished but I must admit that I am only semi-decent and wiki coding --Eatwithspoons 19:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Can we start building a proper wiki now? As things are now it looks a bloody fan wiki, with fail grammar and spelling to boot. I'm happy to help out building them as a normal user, I've made tonnes of modifications on other wiki's and this one is hopefully going to be no different. I hope there's activity here and that the thing will look nice in a couple of weeks/months. Aikon91 13:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've started a character template for people to use on their personal Wiki pages. Also, I'd like to point out I'm a total Template novice, so maybe a staff member can put up an in-depth guide on how to use other's templates on their own page. I know how to use mine, but I'm going to end up changing a lot to it, in time.
- On a side-note, the Wiki is small and it's too easy to just link to the main site for information. We should copy information onto this Wiki. As things are now, there's just Guides on the classes pages, we could sub-categorize them and link to them at an in-depth article on each class.
- I'm basically hoping SOMEONE replies here within the day.
- Also, I was/am Aikon91 up there, because the Wiki is using the nicknames we registered with, I just never read you guys linked it to the Wiki. (Not fond of that link at all, but it's a matter of opinion.) -- Initian - Rawr :3 Come talk to me! ^-^ 18:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Does this mean it's just us two? Bit inconvenient, innit? Oh well, we'll work around that.
- EDIT: Never mind, I've seen EWS fixing minors as well, that makes 3. Three is a good start, but maybe host a Wiki Template Contest? All could be used, of course, but the winner(s) could get some prizes. (I won't be submitting to such a contest, in case someone finds that unfair.) -- Initian - Rawr :3 Come talk to me! ^-^ 11:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Main Page Images
<center>
{| style="background:#3D2B1F" cellpadding="2"
|- border=0 align=center
|[[Image:Archer.jpg|100px|link=[[Archer]]]]
|[[Image:Barbarian.jpg|100px|link=Barbarian]]
|[[Image:Blademaster.jpg|100px|link=Blademaster]]
|[[Image:Cleric.jpg|100px|link=Cleric]]
|[[Image:Venomancer.jpg|100px|link=Venomancer]]
|[[Image:Wizard.jpg|100px|link=Wizard]]
|- border=0 align=center
| [[Archer]]|| [[Barbarian]] || [[Blademaster]] || [[Cleric]] || [[Venomancer]] || [[Wizard]]
|}
</center>
The "link=" part can be removed, and redirects should be done on the actual pages. Less messy, definitely. -- Initian - Rawr :3 Come talk to me! ^-^ 12:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- No, what is done there should work (well, except for the Archer link, which shouldn't have the extra brackets). I'm not sure why it doesn't work, so I suspect that it's either that the wiki is out of date (hence my "Version" section above) or it's missing an extension (though I don't know which one that would be). I did a quick test with similar code on Wikipedia, and it worked fine. For some reason this wiki is treating the link part as alt text instead of making the image work as a link. So, yeah, the "link=" part of each line should be removed, but only until linking that way has been fixed. Also, I don't think you can or even would want to put redirects on a file page. -- Sangodoc (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I know an extreme amount of wiki's redirecting to article's when clicked on a random image. If you need the image you can click from where has been redirected, it should be less messy and more organized. But if it's the out-of-date version making sure it doesn't work, then the
|[[Image:Archer.jpg|100px|Archer|Archer]]
I had figured to work just doesn't.. -goes to play around in sandbox- -- Initian - Rawr :3 Come talk to me! ^-^ 07:37, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I know an extreme amount of wiki's redirecting to article's when clicked on a random image. If you need the image you can click from where has been redirected, it should be less messy and more organized. But if it's the out-of-date version making sure it doesn't work, then the
Copyrighted Content
This image Image:Images-witches-g.jpg appears to violate the "no copyrighted content" rule for the wiki, however I do not see a mechanism to mark the page as a possible violation or to mark it for deletion. Could a moderator please look into this? Thanks. -- Sangodoc (talk) 05:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- This image Image:3deaab178ec9d70034ce069b91486dd5.jpg is probably also a copyright violation and is not being used on any page here. -- Sangodoc (talk) 21:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Sang I'll take care of it --Eatwithspoons 00:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)